|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 14:29:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Abrazzar Why is Jade filling half the slots with his stuff and where the hell are the rest of the council members? Shouldn't there be like 9 or something?
We are working on "larger" issues, in terms of actual size and reach(Though I'm working on smaller issues too, a number of them even). Also the submission date is not for another week, so there is still plenty of time.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 17:06:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Abrazzar
Interesting. Is there a place where you announced what those "larger" issues are and I can read up on them? At the moment it kinda looks as if you just do your thing and to hell with the rest of the players. More positive publicity might be a good idea for the CSM...
Well, I can only speak for myself: Right now, I don't have much to show(Been on holiday the last week, so have really not had time). But look out for it on the market discussion forum, I will be posting much more about it there.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.08.16 10:30:00 -
[3]
What's the point in the deadline? Nobody seems to be keeping it.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.08.16 18:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Scagga Laebetrovo
Originally by: LaVista Vista What's the point in the deadline? Nobody seems to be keeping it.
Please, at least publically show some respect towards the CSM.
Dude, I'm just asking a valid question.
Why would I have to stress out during the week, in order to write up these documents, when I could write then up during saturday? |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 05:31:00 -
[5]
I'm now officially a noob.
"Ruin and hit" = Hit and run. Jesus what lack of sleep can do to you
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.05 03:53:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Yorda When is the next meeting with CCP? I was under the impression that it was late August, but don't see anything about it.
Issues were submitted on the 26th of August. So it will take at least till next week.
But I don't think the date has been announced yet.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.05 09:35:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Yorda When is the next meeting with CCP? I was under the impression that it was late August, but don't see anything about it.
More intriguingly, when is the next CSM meeting? The 17th of August was almost three weeks ago.
I believe we are in a waiting position at present for when CCP gets back to us, at which point we will start the meetings again.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.05 18:05:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Gabriel Darkefyre Here's the Posting Stats for each of the CSM members
Jade Constantine - Last Posted 4th September (Last AH/Jita Post 29th August) Hardin - Last Posted 4th September (Last AH/Jita Post 19th August) LaVista Vista - Last Posted 5th September (Last AH/Jita Post 5th September) Darius Johnson - Last Posted 4th September (Last AH/Jita Post 13th August) Bane Glorious - Last Posted 18th August (Last AH/Jita Post 11th August) Dierdra Vaal - Last Posted 21st August (Last AH/Jita Post 21st August) Serenity Steele - Last Posted 3rd September (Last AH/Jita Post 2nd September) Ankhesentapenkah - Last Posted 31st August (Last AH/Jita Post 28th August)
Heh, for some of them I thought it had been longer, guess I just shot myself in the foot with this one...
That's still pretty bad - only two have posted on CSM forums in the last week, and it's been over two weeks for four of them.
I agree. Pretty scary statistics I think.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.06 05:52:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Jade Constantine you might consider replying to the message I sent to the csm mailing list ten days ago asking the CSM delegates for their opinion of when and what the next meeting should be and involve LaVista. Please don't express public moral outrage when you aren't able to respond to messages yourself.
Oh come on Andrew. That's just stupid.
Do I really have to repeat what Ankh said when she hit the nail right on it's head?
And where did you read that my fellow delegates are terrible? You are obviously not reading my message. I used "scary", which is an informal way of expressing that one is surprised.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.06 17:14:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Jade Constantine If I go ahead and schedule a meeting on that basis whats the chances somebody accuses me of "making up the rules" and "re-writing the CSM" again? Is more drama what we really need at this point?
I don't think it will cause any drama to go right ahead with it. People can't whine if they didn't voice their opinion in the first place.
Quote: Are the Goons going to veto that on the continuing grounds that nobody else on the CSM has their "specific knowledge" of territorial warfare? If they do that is anything the rest of us going to say on the issue going to matter anyways?
No. That would be silly if they did. Even if they did during a meeting, then the logs will always be public and even the community can identify the reason why we are not discussiong the issue which bothers a lot of people.
|
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:39:00 -
[11]
I agree with Inanna. I'm certainly building up a backlog of issues which has to be discussed.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 19:03:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
This only makes sense if you believe that CCP is intentionally ignoring the CSM and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. And in that case, the correct thing to do is resign in protest en masse, and probably head straight for the gaming press to raise hell, rather than sit in a corner.
Of course, I don't believe that CCP is lying about their commitment to the CSM, and I don't think you believe it either. Yes, they're busy. Yes, they'll get back to you Soon(tm). But given that the time between being raised in the Assembly Hall and being put into a patch is likely going to be several months at a minimum for the vast majority of issues, what's an extra couple of weeks in the middle of that? Besides, even if they don't get back to you, they can still take your ideas and implement them - it's far worse for accountability and communication, of course, but it doesn't actually harm the CSM's core function.
So given that the only reason for your delay is CCP's delay, and that you've all known about CCPs propensity towards delay for years now, this all seems kind of pointless. Clear your backlog, and let CCP worry about theirs.
CSM just received a preliminary response to all the issues. The issues weren sent on the 26th of August. So the issues were handeled in exactly 2 weeks, as the CSM document describes.
So everything is fine...
As for the actual content of the response, I'll not comment on for now till I make sure it won't break the NDA or anything, since the information we got is that there will be official posts for it after the discussions with CCP we will be having. |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 18:50:00 -
[13]
The CSM really does need better tools for things like this. A wiki would be IDEAL.
But these issues were submitted for this round of CSM-CCP meetings:
0102-01-0041 Alliance Corps in Factional Warfare 0102-01-0042 Fix Precision Heavy missiles 0102-01-0043 POS Standing Fixes 0102-01-0044 Gate Agressoin Timer 0102-04-0045 Buff Minmatar Capital Ships 0102-04-0046 Crane needs powergrid increase 0102-01-0047 Nighthawk needs powergrid increase 0102-01-0048 Rigged Ships and Cargo issues 0102-06-0049 Dynamic Agent Qualities 0102-01-0050 Factional Warfare Storyline Impact 0102-01-0051 Unnerf the Bio length 0102-06-0052 Buff Gallente Ewar 0102-04-0053 Musical Intruments in Ambulation 0102-02-0054 Rigs need some attention 0102-01-0055 Covert ops and cynojammers 0102-04-0056 Turning Titans into mobile stations 0102-01-0057 Remote Repair issues 0102-01-0059 Covert Ops Jumpbridge Range 0102-01-0060 Third Bloodline Background 0102-01-0061 MOTD for fleets and gangs 0102-06-0062 Bountyhunting Improvements 0102-06-0063 Mercenary Improvements 0102-09-0064 Ship Maintenance Bays Revisited 0102-03-0065 Missions under review 0102-09-0066 UI Combat Notifications 0102-09-0067 UI Distance Status Change 0102-09-0068 UI Hotkeys 0102-09-0069 UI Visibility Status of Modules 0102-06-0070 UI Slash Commands 0102-03-0071 Small Anchorable Structures 0102-03-0072 Remote Jumpclone Destruction 0102-03-0073 Drone Quirky Behaviour 0102-03-0074 More Crossfaction Ships 0102-08-0075 Forum Reworking 0102-07-0076 Kill Rights should be transferable 0102-07-0077 Funky POS Recommendations 0101-04-0029 Corporate Email Issues 0101-01-0030 Wreck Flagging in PVP 0101-01-0031 Account Security ( 0101-08-0032 Moon Mining 0101-08-0033 Color Deficiency 0101-08-0034 Mac/Linux Client Issues 0101-08-0035 Multiple Monitors 0101-08-0036 Small Freighters 0101-05-0038 Rebalancing Large Autocannons 0101-02-0039 Completion of Story Arcs 0101-02-0040 Improvements for Roleplaying
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 04:15:00 -
[14]
[CSM Incarnation #][CSM Meeting # for that incnarnation]-[CSM Member ID]-[Issue ID]
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 10:34:00 -
[15]
Originally by: MotherMoon
Quote: 0102-07-0077 Funky POS Recommendations
La vista... you better not let it slip this time
Don't worry. It was a part of the package we sent for sure
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 12:22:00 -
[16]
1,5 months.
|
|
|
|